Higher Education News | Week Ending February 7, 2020
| “We Need More Vigorous Debate”: A Conversation with Michael S. Roth | Institutions that want to enhance belonging and overcome the privileges wealthy students enjoy generally have hard choices to make in allocating resources. Do they devote more financial aid to bring in more low-income students, or do they provide funds to help a smaller number of low-income students truly flourish? If a selective private school has, say, 15 percent Pell-eligible students, it might set a target of increasing financial aid resources so as to enroll 25 percent of these low-income undergrads in the future. Alternatively, with more resources, it can set the goals of providing greater academic and psychological support for the cohort it already has. Most institutions find it difficult to do either, and very few can do both (although the wealthiest certainly can). [Note: If only private nonprofit institutions had such altruistic agendas for recruiting low-income and Pell-eligible students. In truth, many of these colleges recruit low-income students and Pell-eligible students to attend for a year or two so that the revenue generated from their federal grants and students loans can be reallocated to academic programs that service the wealthiest students.]Continue Reading



